Mr John Home Robertson MSP
The Town House
Thank you for your letter of 15 July 2006.
Are you aware that the matters raised by Mr
Scott have already been the subject of lengthy correspondence both
from officials of COPES and myself? I have provided Mr Scott
with an explanation as to how the decision was taken to impose a
closure period of 100 years on the documents to the Dunblane Inquiry. I
am also aware that he does not accept the explanation provided to
him and in the circumstances there is nothing further that I can
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * * * * *
W W Scott,
23, St. Baldred's Road,
Tel/Fax: 01620 892489
Mr. John Home Robertson, MSP.,
The Town House,
Dunbar, EH42 1ER.
Dear Mr Robertson
I thank you for your letter of 22nd inst.
I cannot deny that there has been lengthy correspondence
as the Lord Advocate states but surely the opinion of Ms. Lynda
Clark should be treated with more respect. He claims correctly
that he has provided me with an explanation as to how the decision
was taken to impose a closure period of 100 years on the documents
to the Dunblane Inquiry however that is not the same as making clear
where the authority came from to impose the closure order. LINK
The lengthy correspondence referred to includes
many pages detailing the legislation under which the Inquiry was
set up. That information was never requested. He and
his officials sent a more or less standard letter to all who enquired
about the 100-year closure. After explaining the setting
up the letter described guidelines and criteria which are used to
Mr. Boyd was content to allow you and others to
believe that there was statutory authority for the closure until
he was forced to admit that there was no such authority. He
had no other choice after the Keeper of the Records of Scotland
informed me that there was no statutory basis for the closure.
The Lord Advocate has said that there is no document
to give authority for the closure. It is strange that papers can
be hidden for 100 years without some form of written authority.
The decision to impose the closure order was taken at a meeting
on 13th January 1997. At that meeting was the Clerk to the
Inquiry and representatives of the Scottish Records Office, the
Police and the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service. Lord
Cullen in a letter to me wrote that those who attended that meeting
did not have the authority, individually or collectively, to impose
a closure order.
Ms. Lynda Clark QC as well as stating that "under
Scots law there is no legislation which provides for a hundred year
closure" also wrote "that understanding of the way in which closure
of public records is operated is not the same as legal authority."
Mr. Leolin Price QC wrote "in recent years guidance,
guidelines and the like are issued by departments and treated as
if they are law; but they are not."
If the Lord Advocate is challenging the views
of these learned people, as it appears to me that he most definitely
is, then he should publicly say so and give his reasons for so doing.
I trust you will help to clarify this matter.
William W Scott
[Ed ~ Read William
W Scott's letter to the Freedom of Information Unit, and other info',
Read the letter from the Chairman of the Scottish Affairs Committee
Mohammad Sarwar MP to William W Scott, LINK.]
Read Mr Scott's press release: "Dunblane - Questions Remain